Chris Hedges: Empire of Illusion (speaking at The New School), video
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOde31QYbI0&w=640&h=385]Around 13:30: “Hope is not for the practical and the sophisticated, the cynics and the complacent, the defeated and the fearful. Hope is what the corporate State which saturates our airwaves with lies seeks to obliterate. … ‘Be afraid’ they tell us. Surrender your liberties to us so we can keep you safe.”
Glenn Greenwald
My parents, who consider themselves quite liberal (and I thought they were, too, when I was growing up) just adore Shields and whoever-it-is. I see them as just another pair of corporate spokespeople for the government:
Establishment thought and the War on Terror
PBS’ News Hour conducted a discussion of the Obama-supported, reform-free Patriot Act extension with conservative David Brooks and “liberal” Mark Shields, and it magnificently highlights conventional establishment thought on such matters… (read more here)
The always-expanding bipartisan Surveillance State, by Glenn Greenwald. An excerpt: This will be the second time that the Democratic Congress — with the support of President Obama (who once pretended to favor reforms) — has extended the Patriot Act without any changes. And note the rationale for why it was done in secret bipartisan meetings: to ensure “as little debate as possible” and “to avoid a protracted and familiar argument over the expanded power the law gives to the government.” Indeed, we wouldn’t want to have any messy, unpleasant democratic debates over “the expanded power the law gives to the government.” Here we find yet again the central myth of our political culture: that there is too little bipartisanship when the truth is there is little in Washington but that. And here we also find — yet again — that the killing of Osama bin Laden is being exploited to justify a continuation, rather than a reduction, in the powers of the National Security and Surveillance States. (read more here)
The self-absorption of America’s ruling class
The “pro-Constitution=pro-terrorist” canard
The lawless Wild West attacks Wikileaks – on the government’s infringement on our first amendment (A Colbert funny version is here.):
The DOJ’s creeping war on whistle-blowers, Glenn Greenwald
Covertly obtaining and then digging through the phone, banking, and travel records of journalists is about as extreme a step as can be taken in trying to detect and punish whistleblowers. By itself, the chilling effect on a free press is substantial and obvious — what whistleblowers would speak to reporters if they know their most private records can be so easily invaded by the Government? — and the invasion of privacy which a journalist has to endure for doing his job is immense. (read more)
Yes, it’s Glenn Greenwald, again. But this is such a powerful piece, I just had to share it. What gets me is that while I understand his title referring to the “un-American” nature of the response, if we were truly sticking to our patriotic roots the Norwegian response would be right in line with what “American” really means.
An un-American response to the Oslo attack
BY GLENN GREENWALD
“…About all of this, The New York Times today says that “Norway’s policy on public security [] seemed defined by a belief that bad things happen elsewhere.” No: it is defined by a belief that there are other values besides security that matter a great deal and that pursuing security above all other values, in a quest for absolute safety, is both self-destructive and futile.” (read the full essay here)
Noam Chomsky (I’m pleased Chomsky notes we shouldn’t ridicule the Tea Party movement but listen to their underlying messages. I’m also happy his view seems to be moving toward that which accepts a more Goffman-esque approach to the social construction of reality.)
Decent (outdated re: Kerry, etc.) interview with George Lakoff about framing: “How to Talk Like a Conservative (if you must).” Most important quote, how has understanding framing helped him politically, his answer could be mine nearly word for word:
It’s allowed me to understand my own moral system and what I believe. It’s allowed me to see what types of liberals there are and what unites them and divides them. It’s allowed me to ask myself more deeply why I believe what I believe and come up with very good answers for it. It’s allowed me to respect conservatives. That’s an important point. I used to be a typical liberal and thought that conservatives are either irrational or mean or cruel or petty or whatever. Now I see that liberals can be those things, too. Most conservatives are conservatives because they think they are morally correct.
Frontline report, “Inside the Terrorism-Industrial Complex.” (dead link, to be updated)
‘America Is NOT Broke’: Michael Moore Speaks in Madison, WI — March 5, 2011
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgNuSEZ8CDw?rel=0]Oh my god. “Fascism Comes to Michigan.” (Utne Reader article)
