caring requires strength (why Romney will win)

Romney will win and the progressives (liberals, Democrats, however you want to label us) are helping to make that happen.

Every time Romney makes one of his gaffes, the progressive and even the moderate communities fall all over themselves with shock, disgust, and a lot of gleeful laughter. Each time we do that we put another nail in our coffin. The radical right knows their base of voters—and their base votes—believes hard work really pays off. In their view, if Romney is rolling in dough and helping the rich, he’s doing it because he’s successful. He must have done what they (the poor, working poor, and fundamentalist evangelical Christians) believe they can do if they try hard enough. He is a successful man, he is at the top of the food chain, so he is a leader (strict father morality) deserving of respect.

When we respond to him and mock him or say he’s awful, we are doing what the well-oiled communications machine of the radical right say that the “elitist liberals” do. We think we are better than everyone. We think we know what’s best for people. We condescend to everyone around us. We pat poor people on the head and give them a cookie and a hug. We don’t know how to be strong (like the successful guys like Romney or George W. Bush). Our wimpy ideas will turn our nation into sinful/amoral hedonists without any sense of responsibility.

Whether everything about Romney’s idiotic statements has been orchestrated, or if he is simply the best choice of puppet for the radical right (all politicians are puppets in this regard, the public face of policy formation and communications), or if they just got lucky that he keeps upsetting the progressives, it’s working. The progressives are all giddy because they think we’ll win. Surely even the least informed voters will realize Romney is an asshole who doesn’t care about them? The progressives are all passionate to show how wrong Romney is. The progressives are all swept away with responding to Romney. That’s how the radical right will win.

We need to stop paying attention to the radical right. We need to embrace our own values and share them with each other:

Hard work should pay off—A man should be able to work one full-time job and bring home enough money to pay for food, shelter, healthcare, and reasonable living expenses for his family. When hard times hit a family, the work they’ve done and the taxes they’ve paid should guarantee their freedom from poverty. Hard work should pay off.

Caring requires strength; caring is strength—Firefighters, police officers, first responders, and soldiers are all in the business of caring. They protect us. When a single mother protects her children by enduring the humiliation of asking for assistance from the government, she is being strong for her family. Protecting is caring and caring requires strength.

Government’s job is protecting our freedom—We should be free to drink clean water, eat disease-free food, and have access to electricity and drivable roads. Our health should be in our own control; the government should protect our medical freedom (access to high quality and truly affordable healthcare). Government’s job is protecting our freedom.

We are strong enough to care about each other. We are strong enough to be proud of our patriotic values (caring and freedom). We love our country because we value freedom: freedom from fear, from illness, and from poverty. We recognize we are a part of an interconnected global community. Finding peaceful solutions to international problems—trying to keep our soldiers safe—protects our freedom. Caring requires strength.

8 Comments

Filed under activism, mindful living, politics

8 responses to “caring requires strength (why Romney will win)

  1. Very well written piece. My question though is why did this not apply to Palin last time?

  2. Thank you. As for applying to Palin, it did, and it does. All of the bashing we do when there are poorly written signs, for example. All of the mocking is distraction. I’ve written about Pailn and the Tea Party before. There’s also the frame of sin and redemption (radical right frame) that follows (explaining why her daughter’s premarital sex was accepted, for example. Rather than wrecking Palin’s credibility as a Christian, it showed she was a good one because she forgave.).

    Since the 80s the radical right has been pulling us closer into their frames and we’re doing most of their work for them. “Climate change,” as another example of a radical right frame, is a phrase brought into active use by the radical right to tone down the meaning of the environmental crisis. Progressives use “climate change” all the time now. :-(

  3. I guess my question was moreso why didn’t McCain/Palin win if your theory is correct. I don’t doubt your opinion that pointing to their repeated gaffes emboldens the right but i do question the fact that it will lead to a win. The right is going to go right and the left left, it’s the centrists who decide most of these things and while I can see them being put off by the lefts high minded look at the buffons stuff, I also see them being worried by what is being shown. With Palin the pointing was as bad if not worse, so if your theory rings true than why did Obama win?

    • Oh, right. Well, I can’t predict the future, so maybe Romney won’t win. I think it didn’t work with Palin because McCain wasn’t with the program enough. He cares too much. He’s too soft for the role he was supposed to play. I’d even say he’s too smart to play the role (“what I say always goes because I’m the male leader”), but I mean that in the way that liberal intellectuals mean it. Who knows, really, though.

      • Hoping you’re right but you are probbaly dead on about McCain. I used to like him until he embraced Bush onstage after Rove push polled about him being a drug addict. Lost a lot of respect for him that day. Either way, i’ll be driving folks to the polls on election day to do what i can. Cant’ complain if I don’t play.

        • I agree about the can’t complain part if I don’t do something. I never have understood people who complain about how things should be different while doing nothing about it. If I don’t like how something is, I do something to change it. (Sometimes my doing something to change it might be my accepting there’s nothing I can do at this time.)

          One thing I didn’t make clear here (it wasn’t directly enough connected to my point) was that it’s not that people who want that Strong Man leader are somehow stupid. They just have different values; different frames for their reality. As I understand it, they think our concepts of caring (in a progressive way), empathy, and critical thinking (in an intellectual way) are not qualities that help a leader be a good/strong leader. It’s not that they think there’s no place for those qualities, it’s just not what makes a good leader as far as they are concerned.

  4. FYI, check this out.

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/09/24/120924fa_fact_lepore?currentPage=2

    Different, but related. There’s nothing new under the sun.

I would love to hear from you (leave a reply?)...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s